Possible performance suggestion

Locked
xender
Posts: 89
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2014 10:46 am
Possible performance suggestion

Post by xender » Sun Apr 12, 2020 7:10 pm

Hi guys!

I was exploring the external model while the plane was on midair and when i entered the cockpit (in the external model) i saw something rather shocking: On the external model, the VC is FULLY working too! :shock: i saw the flight plan on the displays, i was able to click the switches, use the FMC etc etc. all of that from the external model! :shock:

That made me think: What is the cost of that in terms of performance? Don't get me wrong: It looks great!, but Isn't it wasteful to include a fully functioning VC on the external model specially taking into account that the plane is on the heavy side already? Is it possible to disable it or maybe include a checkbox on the config app?

N4GIX
Posts: 1023
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2010 3:47 pm
Re: Possible performance suggestion

Post by N4GIX » Mon Apr 13, 2020 12:47 am

I've just spent my entire Easter Sunday working on creating a low-resolution VC... ;)

xender
Posts: 89
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2014 10:46 am
Re: Possible performance suggestion

Post by xender » Mon Apr 13, 2020 1:53 am

N4GIX wrote:
Mon Apr 13, 2020 12:47 am
I've just spent my entire Easter Sunday working on creating a low-resolution VC... ;)
Wait... Get your hands away from that mouse/keyboard!!! :lol: I love the VC and its resolution. Im just wondering about the cockpit in the external model. I just think it may not be a good idea (From a performance point of view) to have a fully functioning cockpit on the external model. BUT the real cockpit, the one implemented in the internal model is glorious. Don't touch that :lol:

N4GIX
Posts: 1023
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2010 3:47 pm
Re: Possible performance suggestion

Post by N4GIX » Mon Apr 13, 2020 3:50 pm

I guess I wasn't clear enough; the low-res VC is for the external model! ;)

xender
Posts: 89
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2014 10:46 am
Re: Possible performance suggestion

Post by xender » Mon Apr 13, 2020 4:44 pm

N4GIX wrote:
Mon Apr 13, 2020 3:50 pm
I guess I wasn't clear enough; the low-res VC is for the external model! ;)
Ahh i see. That's great! :)

What do you think about the fully functioning VC on the external model? Do you think it may have some performance impact? I was thinking that maybe on the external model there should only be the cabin but with the cockpit door closed. That way you can have a dummy, low res vc on the external model without impacting the looks of the passenger cabin.

xender
Posts: 89
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2014 10:46 am
Re: Possible performance suggestion

Post by xender » Mon Apr 13, 2020 4:53 pm

N4GIX wrote:
Mon Apr 13, 2020 3:50 pm
I guess I wasn't clear enough; the low-res VC is for the external model! ;)
Btw, there's another small bug on the passenger cabin: While the tables are getting out and unfolding, you can see the scenery in the gap where the table comes from. I can get an screenshot if you need. It mainly affects the tables that farthest from the cockpit, the ones at the back of the plane.

N4GIX
Posts: 1023
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2010 3:47 pm
Re: Possible performance suggestion

Post by N4GIX » Tue Apr 14, 2020 3:43 pm

xender wrote:
Mon Apr 13, 2020 4:53 pm
Btw, there's another small bug on the passenger cabin: While the tables are getting out and unfolding, you can see the scenery in the gap where the table comes from. I can get an screenshot if you need. It mainly affects the tables that farthest from the cockpit, the ones at the back of the plane.
That's a new feature: fresh air for the passengers!
Seriously, I'm not too bothered about it, but have made a note in case further problems crop up.


Locked

Return to “K.A.350 Support Forum”